You get a call from a client eight months after her project wrapped. She was at a local artisan market and spotted a set of throw pillows in the exact silk her workroom used for her living room drapes. Same colorway. Same repeat. She is asking you, gently but pointedly, whether that is actually possible.
It is. And it happens more than the industry likes to admit.
Customer’s Own Material, better known as COM, is fabric the client has already paid for and sent to a workroom to be built into drapery, upholstery, or bedding. Whatever is left over after the cutting is technically still the client’s property. In practice, much of it never makes its way back to anyone who paid for it. It sits on a shelf, gets folded into inventory, or, in the case that sparked this conversation, turns up for sale.
This is a business question, not a design question. If the answer to “who owns the leftover fabric” is unclear on your jobs, you have a fabric ownership problem and a paperwork problem happening at the same time, and only one of those is something you can actually fix before your next order ships.
Where the Extra Yardage Comes From, and Why It Rarely Comes Back
Every COM order includes a built-in cushion. Workrooms ask for more fabric than the math strictly requires because they need room to account for repeat variance, cutting error, and the unusable few inches at the front of a bolt. That padding is standard practice and, within reason, defensible.
The problem shows up when the padding stops looking like a cushion and starts looking like a markup. Interior Design Community put the question to its Instagram audience after members in one region began comparing notes about a workroom that seemed to be requesting far more fabric than a finished piece would use, and then selling pillows and other small goods out of what came back.
@christopherkennedyinc has run into the same math problem more than once:
“Absolutely! COM requirements are getting out of hand, in my opinion. (I still do not know how a basic upholstered bed takes 14 yards of plain fabric, but that’s what I always get asked for.) I have fairly recently started insisting that I get fabrics back and I’ve even rummaged through the stacks of bolts at my workrooms. I recently had a window treatment workroom in Idaho insist that they needed 5 yards (that’s 15 linear feet!) for an 18″ tall x 36″ wide fake roman valance. They still cannot explain the math or give me a diagram, and I’m not sending them 5 yards.”
@christopherkennedyinc
The takeaway is not that every workroom dishonestly pads its numbers. It is that a yardage request with no supporting math is not something a designer has to accept on faith. If a workroom cannot produce a cutting diagram or explain a repeat calculation, that is a legitimate question to ask before the order goes out, not after the leftovers have disappeared.
The same pattern shows up one level up the supply chain. Several designers in this conversation pointed out that furniture manufacturers who build COM pieces in-house are just as prone to keeping leftover fabric as independent workrooms are, and some are less transparent about it. A manufacturer that never itemizes what it used and never offers what was not used applies the same logic a small local workroom applies when nobody asks for the fabric back in writing.
The Business Impact: Why Ambiguous Ownership Is a Liability, Not Just an Annoyance
When a client already suspects that a workroom or a designer profited from her leftover fabric, the damage to the relationship happens fast. It does not matter whether anyone intended to do anything wrong. What matters is that the client paid in full for material that vanished, and nobody can explain where it went.
@2ashleyrogers put the stakes in blunt terms:
“Customer paid for it. If the designer or the workroom keeps leftovers, that’s theft UNLESS they got permission. If one workroom is consistently keeping expensive leftovers, there could be a class action lawsuit in their future.”
@2ashleyrogers
Educational content, not legal advice. Whether unreturned COM legally qualifies as theft or conversion depends on your contract language, your state, and the specific facts of a given order. A designer facing a live dispute should talk to an attorney rather than rely on general guidance, including this post.
What matters for your business regardless of the legal label is that you sit between the client and the workroom. If fabric goes missing and there was no written permission for anyone to keep it, the client’s first call is to you, not to a workroom she has never spoken with directly. You inherit the reputational and financial exposure even when you personally never touched the leftover yardage.
Not every case is bad faith. @robertsteloffdesign, who has spent years inside workrooms, offers a more measured read on why fabric tends to go missing:
“Having been in high-end practice for several years & ‘living’ in my workrooms, I can honestly say, I don’t believe there’s any malicious or nefarious behavior, however, possibly some laziness for accurate measurements for plain goods vs fabrics with repeats, but more so, the workroom protecting themselves against underestimating requirements.”
@robertsteloffdesign
Both things can be true at once. A workroom can be padding its yardage requests for entirely defensible reasons and still be sitting on a growing pile of client-owned fabric it never intended to keep, because nobody wrote down what should happen to it after the cutting table. The fix for both scenarios is identical: put the disposition of leftover fabric in writing before the order goes out, so intent is never the thing that ends up in dispute.
There is also a quieter cost worth naming. Designers who are transparent about reusing small amounts of leftover fabric, for donations or extra accent pieces, tend to have clients who feel like partners in that decision rather than victims of it. The difference is not the fabric. It is whether the client was told in advance what might happen to it.
Put Fall-Off Language in Every Work Order
The simplest fix in the entire conversation came from the shortest comment in the thread. @gryphon_interiors handles this with one line in every work order:
“I always specify on my work orders that fall-off is to be returned.”
@gryphon_interiors
That is the whole policy. It costs nothing, takes one sentence, and it moves the burden of proof from “prove the workroom did something wrong” to “the work order said this fabric comes back, and it didn’t.” Workrooms build to the paperwork in front of them. If the paperwork does not mention leftover fabric, most default to their internal policy, which is not guaranteed to match what your client assumes is happening to her material.
Build the clause into your standard work order template, not just the orders where you happen to remember. Specify that fall-off, remnants, and any unused COM yardage over a stated minimum- a half yard is a common threshold- are to be returned with the finished piece or shipped back to the studio separately. Name who the fabric belongs to explicitly: the client, unless your contract states otherwise in writing.
The fall-off clause does not need to stand alone. It works best alongside the rest of the protective language most studios are already building into their agreements, covering everything from payment terms to liability for work you did not perform. If your paperwork has not been reviewed in a while, Essential Interior Design Contract Clauses to Protect Your Business is a useful checklist for what else might be missing.
This same clause matters just as much with manufacturers as it does with independent workrooms. Put the same return language in your purchase order or COM instructions to a manufacturer that you would put in a workroom’s cutting ticket. The vendor relationship does not exempt anyone from the same paperwork discipline, and a manufacturer that balks at a written return clause is telling you something about how it has handled this question in the past.
What to Do With the Remnants You Actually Get Back
Getting the fabric back is only half the system. The other half is knowing what to do with it once it lands back on your desk, because “send it all back to the client” isn’t always the right answer, either. Nobody wants a manila envelope with four inches of drapery silk in it, and clients rarely want it either.
@wheatonwhaleyhome has built a threshold-based process that handles this cleanly:
“As far as excess, I quote every project. I tell them exactly what to order. If there is anything left (and it’s typically only when someone is doing pillows), I’ll just put it in with their order when it’s complete, or just collect over time and get them to send me a label to return everything of theirs. If it’s scraps or less than a yard, I collect for donating to a local charity that uses them. If I bought the fabric, which does happen a good bit, I keep anything remaining.”
@wheatonwhaleyhome
Notice the structure. Usable yardage is returned to the client, either immediately or upon request. True scraps go to donation rather than the trash or a personal stockpile. And fabric the designer purchased outright, rather than fabric the client paid for as part of the project, follows different rules entirely, because ownership was never ambiguous in the first place. That last distinction is worth explicitly writing into your own policy, since it is the one most likely to get blurred in a client’s memory of what she paid for.
@salon.libertine’s process adds a valuable piece to borrow: naming the wastage before it happens, not after.
“You always have to round up, in case a repeat is not exactly as stated, in case the fabric company has cut slightly too short, not straight. Sometimes the bit they fix to the roll first cannot be used, it is often really creased. I usually made a couple of free cushions for my clients. Or if I knew there was going to be lots of wastage, ie for big repeats, I would discuss that with them. Then they could order cushions, keep the fabric or donate it. I always end up donating lots to schools and craft groups.”
@salon.libertine
That conversation, held before the order ships rather than after the leftovers show up, is what turns a fabric dispute into a fabric plan. A client who was told upfront that a large repeat fabric would leave several usable yards, and who got to choose among extra cushions, a straight return, or a donation, has no reason to wonder later whether someone quietly kept her silk.
Donation is not limited to fabric scraps. The same instinct applies to any leftover material, fixture, or piece of surplus inventory sitting in your studio. Where to Sell Extra Interior Design Items: A Guide for Designers covers resale platforms and donation partners worth having on hand before the next project wraps.
Decide the Policy Before the Next COM Order Ships
None of this requires a lawyer, new software, or an uncomfortable conversation mid-project. It requires one paragraph in your work order template, applied consistently, before the next piece of COM fabric goes out the door.
State who owns leftover fabric. State the yardage threshold above which it gets returned. State what happens to scraps below that threshold, and get the client’s sign-off on that plan in the same document where she approves the yardage and price. Apply the same language to workrooms and manufacturers alike, and do not treat a manufacturer’s silence on the subject as an acceptable answer.
The designers in this conversation who never have to have an uncomfortable fabric conversation with an unhappy client are not the ones who got lucky. They are the ones who wrote the policy down before a client ever had a reason to ask.
Find IDC content more easily in Google
Set Interior Design Community as a preferred source in your Google settings and we’ll show up more often when you search. It takes less than a minute.
Add IDC as a preferred source →
Instagram for Interior Designers: Does It Actually Bring in Clients?
Project Photography Rights: When Clients Want Veto Power
